Lights, Camera, ACTIONS! The Video
Lawrence Lightner recently offered me eternal gratitude for a walk through on actions. So I made a flash video. I figure he now owes me his eternal soul. The rest of you have no such burden. Well, not really. . .
Lawrence Lightner recently offered me eternal gratitude for a walk through on actions. So I made a flash video. I figure he now owes me his eternal soul. The rest of you have no such burden. Well, not really. . .
Gelling your light sources for color accuracy (matching your flash to that tungsten light bulb in the room) or effect (giving a background a slight touch of blue, for example) can be the difference between a good photo and a great photo. In fact, Strobist already has two of their four articles on just this subject (here and here).
They cover using gels in order to match light sources that are too warm, like tungsten, or just plain hideous, such as fluorescent. They mention all sorts of gels, like CTO (color temperature orange) and minus green, but they don’t mention the cost of those gels. Wouldn’t it be nice to get them for cheap? How about a penny?
For those that don’t know, gaffer tape is in pretty much every working photographers bag. It’s to a photographer what duct tape is to a handy man. In fact, it’s so versatile, that I’ve used it to:
Gaffer isn’t perfect though. It’s not cheap, not compared to duct tape. At 20 to 30 dollars a roll, it can get pricey if you go through a lot of it. And worst yet, the big rolls are bulky and inconvenient to take with you. Some stores offer mini rolls of gaffer, that are great to pocket or toss in a bag, but those are 10 dollars or more a roll, and only about a couple of yards worth of tape. I can go through that in one outing. Wouldn’t it be great if we could make our own small roll from the larger roll, so that it’s both convenient and inexpensive?