<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spending Smart: So What do I Buy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pshizzy.com/2008/06/spending-smart-so-what-do-i-buy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pshizzy.com/2008/06/spending-smart-so-what-do-i-buy/</link>
	<description>Tips, Tricks, and Articles on Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 11:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Quiroga</title>
		<link>http://www.pshizzy.com/2008/06/spending-smart-so-what-do-i-buy/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>George Quiroga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pshizzy.com/?p=75#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that lenses should be the primary consideration instead of camera bodies.

When I shoot outdoor sports (primarily kid&#039;s soccer or Pro Beach Volleyball), I shoot with older Canon bodies and a 100-400 IS L Series lens (my personal favorite). I know it is a slower lens but for outdoors that isn&#039;t a problem and I like the zoom range. I also use that lens for wildlife photography since the 1.6x factor on my Canon camera makes it a 640mm (full frame equivalent) lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that lenses should be the primary consideration instead of camera bodies.</p>
<p>When I shoot outdoor sports (primarily kid&#8217;s soccer or Pro Beach Volleyball), I shoot with older Canon bodies and a 100-400 IS L Series lens (my personal favorite). I know it is a slower lens but for outdoors that isn&#8217;t a problem and I like the zoom range. I also use that lens for wildlife photography since the 1.6x factor on my Canon camera makes it a 640mm (full frame equivalent) lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.pshizzy.com/2008/06/spending-smart-so-what-do-i-buy/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>John Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pshizzy.com/?p=75#comment-76</guid>
		<description>For those shooting Canon, the 85 f/1.8 is a STEAL at the current prices, and if you can find a good one used for around $300, don&#039;t ponder too long, BUY IT!  I have the 24-70, 70-200IS, 300IS, and others, but that 85 just ROCKS whenever it&#039;s on camera.  I try to find reasons to use it, really!  It is an excellent gymnastics lens for beam and bars: fast focus, SHARP focus, and tele enough that you&#039;re not right in the gymnast&#039;s face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those shooting Canon, the 85 f/1.8 is a STEAL at the current prices, and if you can find a good one used for around $300, don&#8217;t ponder too long, BUY IT!  I have the 24-70, 70-200IS, 300IS, and others, but that 85 just ROCKS whenever it&#8217;s on camera.  I try to find reasons to use it, really!  It is an excellent gymnastics lens for beam and bars: fast focus, SHARP focus, and tele enough that you&#8217;re not right in the gymnast&#8217;s face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

